Grumpy Old Sod Dot Com - an internet voice for the exasperated. Sick of the nanny state? Pissed off with politicians? Annoyed by newspapers? Irate with the internet? Tell us about it!

Send us an email
Go back
11th September 2013: The world's gone mad and I'm the only one who knows
13th August 2013: Black is white. Fact. End of.
11th August 2013: Electric cars, not as green as they're painted?
18th June 2013: Wrinklies unite, you have nothing to lose but your walking frames!
17th May 2013: Some actual FACTS about climate change (for a change) from actual scientists ...
10th May 2013: An article about that poison gas, carbon dioxide, and other scientific facts (not) ...
10th May 2013: We need to see past the sex and look at the crimes: is justice being served?
8th May 2013: So, who would you trust to treat your haemorrhoids, Theresa May?
8th May 2013: Why should citizens in the 21st Century fear the law so much?
30th April 2013: What the GOS says today, the rest of the world realises tomorrow ...
30th April 2013: You couldn't make it up, could you? Luckily you don't need to ...
29th April 2013: a vote for NONE OF THE ABOVE, because THE ABOVE are crap ...
28th April 2013: what goes around, comes around?
19th April 2013: everyone's a victim these days ...
10th April 2013: Thatcher is dead; long live Thatcher!
8th April 2013: Poor people are such a nuisance. Just give them loads of money and they'll go away ...
26th March 2013: Censorship is alive and well and coming for you ...
25th March 2013: Just do your job properly, is that too much to ask?
25th March 2013: So, what do you think caused your heterosexuality?
20th March 2013: Feminists - puritans, hypocrites or just plain stupid?
18th March 2013: How Nazi Germany paved the way for modern governance?
13th March 2013: Time we all grew up and lived in the real world ...
12th March 2013: Hindenburg crash mystery solved? - don't you believe it!
6th March 2013: Is this the real GOS?
5th March 2013: All that's wrong with taxes
25th February 2013: The self-seeking MP who is trying to bring Britain down ...
24th February 2013: Why can't newspapers just tell the truth?
22nd February 2013: Trial by jury - a radical proposal
13th February 2013: A little verse for two very old people ...
6th February 2013: It's not us after all, it's worms
6th February 2013: Now here's a powerful argument FOR gay marriage ...
4th February 2013: There's no such thing as equality because we're not all the same ...
28th January 2013: Global Warming isn't over - IT'S HIDING!
25th January 2013: Global Warmers: mad, bad and dangerous to know ...
25th January 2013: Bullying ego-trippers, not animal lovers ...
19th January 2013: We STILL haven't got our heads straight about gays ...
16th January 2013: Bullying ego-trippers, not animal lovers ...
11th January 2013: What it's like being English ...
7th January 2013: Bleat, bleat, if it saves the life of just one child ...
7th January 2013: How best to put it? 'Up yours, Argentina'?
7th January 2013: Chucking even more of other people's money around ...
6th January 2013: Chucking other people's money around ...
30th December 2012: The BBC is just crap, basically ...
30th December 2012: We mourn the passing of a genuine Grumpy Old Sod ...
30th December 2012: How an official body sets out to ruin Christmas ...
16th December 2012: Why should we pardon Alan Turing when he did nothing wrong?
15th December 2012: When will social workers face up to their REAL responsibility?
15th December 2012: Unfair trading by a firm in Bognor Regis ...
14th December 2012: Now the company that sells your data is pretending to act as watchdog ...
7th December 2012: There's a war between cars and bikes, apparently, and  most of us never noticed!
26th November 2012: The bottom line - social workers are just plain stupid ...
20th November 2012: So, David Eyke was right all along, then?
15th November 2012: MPs don't mind dishing it out, but when it's them in the firing line ...
14th November 2012: The BBC has a policy, it seems, about which truths it wants to tell ...
12th November 2012: Big Brother, coming to a school near you ...
9th November 2012: Yet another celebrity who thinks, like Jimmy Saville, that he can behave just as he likes because he's famous ...
5th November 2012: Whose roads are they, anyway? After all, we paid for them ...
7th May 2012: How politicians could end droughts at a stroke if they chose ...
6th May 2012: The BBC, still determined to keep us in a fog of ignorance ...
2nd May 2012: A sense of proportion lacking?
24th April 2012: Told you so, told you so, told you so ...
15th April 2012: Aah, sweet ickle polar bears in danger, aah ...
15th April 2012: An open letter to Anglian Water ...
30th March 2012: Now they want to cure us if we don't believe their lies ...
28th February 2012: Just how useful is a degree? Not very.
27th February 2012: ... so many ways to die ...
15th February 2012: DO go to Jamaica because you definitely WON'T get murdered with a machete. Ms Fox says so ...
31st January 2012: We don't make anything any more
27th January 2012: There's always a word for it, they say, and if there isn't we'll invent one
26th January 2012: Literary criticism on GOS? How posh!
12th December 2011: Plain speaking by a scientist about the global warming fraud
9th December 2011: Who trusts scientists? Apart from the BBC, of course?
7th December 2011: All in all, not a good week for British justice ...
9th November 2011: Well what d'you know, the law really IS a bit of an ass ...

 

 
Captain Grumpy's bedtime reading. You can buy them too, if you think you're grumpy enough!
More Grumpy Old Sods on the net

 

 
Older stuff
 

 

 

 
It's always good to have one's own views confirmed, and the big splash on the front of the Mail on Sunday this week did exactly that.
 
Undercover reporters posing as agents for an East European country had contacted the firm that makes most of the speed cameras in the UK, and elicited some amazing information that reinforces all our fears. You can read the whole article here.
 
The boss of a leading supplier of the devices admitted "There will be so much money coming in you won't know what to do with it." He urged the reporters to site the cameras not where accidents had occurred but where they could catch "businessmen in the morning and school-run mums in the afternoon." He went on to claim that the courts which process fines and issue the points on a driver's licence have been struggling to cope with all the cheques.
 
The article also explains how the government is manipulating the camera industry so that it can rake in vast profits. The government takes ALL the revenue from speed cameras, then gives some of it back. Each camera partnership sets a target of the number of motorists it will catch each year. If it fails to meet the target, the government cuts its share of the revenue. If it achieves more than its target, the government keeps all the extra money. Of course that means that next year the partnership will set a higher target so it can attract a larger grant - and although it escapes any of the blame, the Government picks up all the profits!
 
Doesn't sound as though road safety is much of a prime consideration, does it?
 
The camera firm, Tele-Traffic UK, supplies 97 per cent of the country's police forces with portable laser cameras which are hand-held or set up in special roving police vans. It is run by three former policemen.
 
Tele-Traffic sells basic hand-held laser speed cameras for £3,000 and the directors told how this could be recovered from speeding drivers in just an hour, saying "Take the UK model of £60 a pop. If you buy a piece of our kit at £3,000, then operate it in a two-hour session, on an averagely busy road, you will catch about 100 drivers that's £6,000."
 
Predictably this news has been greeted with the usual response - "If you don't want to pay the fines, don't speed". That's all very well if the speed limits the cameras are enforcing have been set at appropriate levels and with regard to the nature of the road and its accident history. Sadly, speed limits are put in place by local authorities, not the police, and some local authorities do so for very dubious reasons. We have written before about Suffolk's disastrous record, for instance, where the introduction of blanket 30mph limits (450 of them all at once) led to a 69% increase in fatalities the next year. On Suffolk's most dangerous road, the A140 between Diss and Coddenham, a confusing system of varying limits has been put in place against the wishes of local people, simply to avoid spending money on improving the road.
 
The government's own advice to local authorities acknowledges that drivers cannot (not will not, but can not) obey a speed limit that differs too much from the average speed on that piece of road, and advises using a calculation called the 85th percentile to establish the correct speed for the road. Sadly, many local authorities either don't understand or choose to ignore this advice.
 
The argument that if one doesn't like being fined one shouldn't speed is not so far removed from those sad little doormats who don't object to ID cards - or any of the other invasions our privacy is threatened by these days - because "I've got nothing to hide so why should I worry?"
 
The reason they should worry is precisely because they have nothing to hide - so why should they be tagged and spied-on like convicts or cattle? The history of the 20th Century is haunted by the sad wraiths of millions of people who felt they had nothing to hide right up to the moment the doorbell rang and the jackboots clattered on the front step.
 

 
The GOS says: You could do worse than look at these other articles on the same subject …
 
Loophole could invalidate thousands of camera fines
Camera statistics don't add up
Avoid a ticket by changing lanes

 

 

 
Use this Yahoo Search box to find more grumpy places,
either on this site or on the World Wide Web.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Copyright © 2007 The GOS
 
This site created and maintained by PlainSite